Comments
Related page | Author | Message |
---|---|---|
![]() ![]() 2016-06-07 23:50 | Does this mark the end of the DLCs? | |
![]() 2016-06-07 21:05 | Nice! And I have a replica of this in my garage too... and this is a free car so I'll have both! ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-07 11:45 | About time! At least it's free, which is nice. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 21:26 | GroupB wrote US/Canada only. We kinda have them here on everything, tho I'm not sure if mandatory. Our rules are as up tight | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 18:35 | speedfreak975 wrote plus arent those reflectors madatory worldwide not just america US/Canada only. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 18:34 | J-2 wrote Have in mind those are not blinkers. They're not, but they *are* lights in addition to being reflectors. They come on when the headlamps are switched on. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 18:00 | oh in that case for reflectors they are placed really well especially at night. plus for future entries and the rest this car is made by a Canadian engineering company Multimatic. plus arent those reflectors madatory worldwide not just america | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 17:57 | Have in mind those are not blinkers. Front orange, and rear, red. Those are side reflectors, and are mandatory on every car sold in the US, so even though the protoype didn't had any (obviously you want a clear and nice look on a prototype, and side reflectors are the last thing you want to add) the car was going to have them anyway. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 17:35 | GroupB wrote thanks, subtle changes. the rear blinkers are like the front ones. subtle and nice but dunno can they be misunderstood to some as lazy placement like xj220 last minute blinkers... | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 17:12 | speedfreak975 wrote you mean the slightly bigger side mirrors, i never noticed side markers in the pictures i saw....well still thats gonna be hard to guess in unlicensed games ![]() edit : you mean the blinkers on the front located next to the wheel arches. i thought you were talking from back cuz i haven't seen production model back fordauthority.com/2016/01/whats-been-changed-on-the-production-2017-ford-gt/ | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 16:46 | GroupB wrote They don't look identical if you know what to look for. Among other things, the production version has different side mirrors and the addition of side marker lights. you mean the slightly bigger side mirrors, i never noticed side markers in the pictures i saw....well still thats gonna be hard to guess in unlicensed games ![]() edit : you mean the blinkers on the front located next to the wheel arches. i thought you were talking from back cuz i haven't seen production model back -- Last edit: 2016-06-01 16:50:28 | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 16:22 | speedfreak975 wrote But the prototype and production model look identical (i think) so we will never know. i guess it becomes by substitution. considering this was a reveal. Later on it becomes normal. plus after i researched the car extensively its probably became on off my favourite modern supercars They don't look identical if you know what to look for. Among other things, the production version has different side mirrors and the addition of side marker lights. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 15:57 | But the prototype and production model look identical (i think) so we will never know. i guess it becomes by substitution. considering this was a reveal. Later on it becomes normal. plus after i researched the car extensively its probably became on off my favourite modern supercars | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 15:40 | speedfreak975 wrote so...next game this will be a ? Hopefully T10 will replace it with the production version. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 14:57 | GroupB wrote The version in the game is still a prototype. so...next game this will be a ? | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 14:24 | speedfreak975 wrote isnt the 2017 model technically a production model ? The version in the game is still a prototype. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 12:04 | isnt the 2017 model technically a production model ? | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-01 07:27 | Shouldn't the origin be Canada considering Multimatic is building it | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-30 18:24 | speedfreak975 wrote technically speaking its a fastback, a hatchback based on how the boot opens Yeah, trunk opens with a back window so it's not a sedan. Must be a hatchback. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-30 15:59 | technically speaking its a fastback, a hatchback based on how the boot opens | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-28 17:27 | It's not Mercedes-AMG it's just regular Mercedes-Benz A-Class www.webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=19107 Car is in use long ago they started naming them Mercedes-AMG -- Last edit: 2016-05-28 17:28:21 | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-26 12:45 | How am i being rude, when you of all people make fun and couldn't care less . anyways glad you tasted your own medicine because speaking normally about the rules...you'll probably disrespect the persons opinion which you did. plus you took silly goose as a rude insult ....srsly . This is the internet if I truly wanted to insult you I would have | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-26 08:01 | Catan69 wrote You can say it without being rude. I study automotive design, those are the rules of it. Sorry. I didn't mean to offend you. ![]() | |
![]() 2016-05-26 07:54 | You can say it without being rude. I study automotive design, those are the rules of it. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-26 04:23 | And...you can drive it in the rain ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-25 23:33 | Desscythe17 wrote And coupes are not SUVs. True. ![]() speedfreak975 wrote It's funny you still think old rules apply. Silly goose this the new age of design.....the 570 GT can be classified as a GT, a hatchback and a sports car or supercar....which is a first. We already said that what was black and white doesn't exist on new cars it's grey. This is a coupe in today's world like it or not. Compare it to normal GLE and see the difference. The fact you think old laws still work makes me laugh Well you could have said that without being fucking rude about it. Catan69 wrote There are rules in automotive design that must be respected, such as proportions. For make an example, most of executive sedans have a wheelbase that is long 3 wheels put one after the other. The front wheel arch is always higher than the rear. The headlight must be in line, at least most of the time, with the front grille. No random lines, everything must be in its place. There are actually 4-door coupe, like Mercedes CLA, though this is a market strategy in order to give to the car the sportive image that it needs. To me a coupe will always be a 2 door, a sedan will always be a 4 door, etc. I don't give a shit about these "rules" of automotive society. | |
![]() 2016-05-25 22:51 | There are rules in automotive design that must be respected, such as proportions. For make an example, most of executive sedans have a wheelbase that is long 3 wheels put one after the other. The front wheel arch is always higher than the rear. The headlight must be in line, at least most of the time, with the front grille. No random lines, everything must be in its place. There are actually 4-door coupe, like Mercedes CLA, though this is a market strategy in order to give to the car the sportive image that it needs. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-25 16:05 | Desscythe17 wrote There are no laws in automotive design as far as I know. To everyone his own opinion ![]() well some people believe in restrictions which was available in older times. where there exceptions. off course but not at this magnitude . design was always classified...hell we do it here all the time. but with modern design its getting gray and vague | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-25 14:19 | For example: Rover P5 sedan and coupe: imgur.com/a/ZelI8 1941 Mercury sedan and coupe: imgur.com/a/H24yZ | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-25 14:15 | Burn Rubber wrote But it's not. Coupes don't have 4 doors. :P The difference between sedans and coupes have never been the number of doors. Both can have 2 or four. It's nothing new or recent. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-25 07:24 | speedfreak975 wrote It's funny you still think old rules apply. Silly goose this the new age of design.....the 570 GT can be classified as a GT, a hatchback and a sports car or supercar....which is a first. We already said that what was black and white doesn't exist on new cars it's grey. This is a coupe in today's world like it or not. Compare it to normal GLE and see the difference. The fact you think old laws still work makes me laugh There are no laws in automotive design as far as I know. To everyone his own opinion ![]() | |
![]() 2016-05-25 04:50 | Interesting little piece of information: in Forzavista, you can manually open the two fully functioning hood flaps and the two functioning roof flaps. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-25 03:53 | It's funny you still think old rules apply. Silly goose this the new age of design.....the 570 GT can be classified as a GT, a hatchback and a sports car or supercar....which is a first. We already said that what was black and white doesn't exist on new cars it's grey. This is a coupe in today's world like it or not. Compare it to normal GLE and see the difference. The fact you think old laws still work makes me laugh | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-24 21:10 | It's funny because HW doesn't have a BMW X6 in its catalogue... | |
![]() 2016-05-24 11:15 | Even if it was only basic paint schemes, at least we had stock cars for free. The Forza Community would make great paints or you could even make your own original one. Now it feels they are just dividing the game down into parts : major motorsports. We allready had Rally expansions. Next up will be 24 Hours, Karts, whatever motorsport is not officially reprensented, I felt just like the ALMS joke in FM4, or imagine what-nots, or even K-Cars... The marketing decision is disappointing -- Last edit: 2016-05-24 11:16:03 | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-24 08:23 | Burn Rubber wrote But it's not. Coupes don't have 4 doors. :P And coupes are not SUVs. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-24 05:32 | speedfreak975 wrote but it is But it's not. Coupes don't have 4 doors. :P | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-24 02:07 | Zordid wrote ...which just isn't a coupe but it is | |
![]() 2016-05-21 10:17 | I 😍 This car | |
![]() 2016-05-20 13:05 | Watching the short introduction after the first race at Homestead, it seems there's a little bit of cut content, because the last car shown before you get to choose the NASCAR Icons Tour is the Lowe's Pro Services paint scheme, which tells me there may have been originally at least 25 cars in this expansion, or the Pro Services paint scheme was the one that was supposed to be in the game from the start, but they went with the standard Lowe's paint scheme instead. | |
![]() 2016-05-19 21:22 | For some reason, still uses the tailights from the 2015 Fusion. | |
![]() 2016-05-19 21:21 | Wow, that BRAD K. font makes me want to crack up. ![]() | |
![]() 2016-05-17 18:05 | Correction: 40 car field, as per 2016 rules. But, yeah...no increase in field size. But the expansion does add rolling starts, which is a positive. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-17 17:50 | Dunno if they will get a full 43 car field this time though ![]() | |
![]() enzo96 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-05-17 17:35 | I personally thinks this is decent looking, and the newer mustang is among the ugliest, even though i never liked the newer models of the two that much | |
![]() 2016-05-17 17:09 | www.youtube.com/watch?v=Saite7sy_dg Well, the official trailer is up. | |
![]() 2016-05-17 16:58 | Especially when it appears that at this point, the only representation of Ford seems to be of the #22 Shell Pennzoil Fusion of Joey Logano, when there's another Penske driver, and two more major Ford teams with 4 additional drivers. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-17 16:55 | Yes, that's why I'm going to wait to add the remaining ones until it's officially announced in order to see how they are going to deal with all this, just to be sure. | |
![]() 2016-05-17 16:53 | I see you went with using the achievement icons. I looked through them, and saw multiple paint schemes for a single driver, so the question is...are the individual cars going to be per driver or per paint scheme? Because if it's by paint scheme, that'll likely mean smaller teams affiliated with larger teams like Furniture Row Racing and Wood Brothers might be left out, plus it'll seem strange racing against two or more cars representing the same driver. Anyways, the Toyotas seem to be represented at least by two Kyle Busch paint schemes (M&Ms and Interstate Batteries), three Carl Edwards paint schemes (Arris, Subway, and Stanley), and one Matt Kenseth paint scheme (DeWalt). | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-17 16:53 | For the first time actually. Until now they were just the plain bodies without paint, and they were referred to as "Stock Cars". Now they have the real deal. |